T satisfactionPatients reported high levels of overall satisfaction with HIV care (mean = 8.5, SD = 1.7, 125-65-5 price median 9.2, range 0.8?0.0). Over 90 would “probably” (23.4 ) or “definitely” 
(69.8 ) “recommend this clinic to other patients with HIV,” and over 80 felt “mostly satisfied” 
(26.7 ) or “completely satisfied” (57.3 ) with their HIV care.Retention in HIV careIn the year before enrollment, 76 of participants had adequate retention in HIV care and 24 had inadequate retention. Participants with adequate retention were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients with inadequate retention (median patient satisfaction score 9.17 versus 8.47, respectively; p = 0.02).Adherence to HAARTA total of 94 were “taking or supposed to be taking HIV medicines.” Among those prescribed HAART, 46 , 28 , 16 , 6 , 2 and 2 reported “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” and “very poor” adherence, respectively. Participants who reported “excellent” adherence were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients who did not (median patient satisfaction score 10.00 versus 8.61, respectively; p,.0001).HIV suppressionHIV RNA values at the time of survey completion 630 days were available for 84 of participants (N = 409). Seventy percent of these patients achieved HIV suppression. Participants who achieved HIV suppression were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients who did not (median patient satisfaction score 9.17 versus 8.47, respectively; p,.01).Baseline modelThe baseline model evaluated the roles of retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART as independent antecedents to HIV suppression (Figure 1). The hypothesized model was a justidentified 15481974 model with zero degrees of freedom. As such, the model did 11967625 not allow a test of goodness-of-fit, since technically, all goodness-of-fit indexes in the estimated model have maximum values (x2 = 0.00, df = 0, p = 0.00, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.00). However, the model still provides suitable estimates of the hypothesized relationships between latent variables. Table 3 shows the parameter estimates from the baseline model. Retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART were significantly associated with greater HIV suppression (standardized coefficient = .220, p,.0001 and standardized coefficient = .287, p,.0001, respectively).Figure 1. Baseline Model of Retention in HIV Care, Adherence to HAART and HIV Suppression (N = 489). Values indicate standardized get RE-640 coefficients; * p,0.05; ** p,0.001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054729.gdardized coefficient = 0.280, p,.0001, respectively) (Table 3). The direct effects of patient satisfaction on retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART were also significant (standardized coefficient = 0.181, ,.0001 and standardized coefficient = 0.203, p,.0001, respectively). The direct effect of patient satisfaction on HIV suppression was not significant (standardized coefficient = .032, p = .60).DiscussionIn this study of 489 participants receiving outpatient HIV primary care, overall patient satisfaction with care is positively related to retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART, which in turn serve as key determinants of HIV suppression. The data suggest that patient satisfaction may provide a way to improve HIV outcomes through its positive influences on adherence to HAART and retention in HIV care. This finding suggests that patient-centered interventions designed to improve the care experience coul.T satisfactionPatients reported high levels of overall satisfaction with HIV care (mean = 8.5, SD = 1.7, median 9.2, range 0.8?0.0). Over 90 would “probably” (23.4 ) or “definitely” (69.8 ) “recommend this clinic to other patients with HIV,” and over 80 felt “mostly satisfied” (26.7 ) or “completely satisfied” (57.3 ) with their HIV care.Retention in HIV careIn the year before enrollment, 76 of participants had adequate retention in HIV care and 24 had inadequate retention. Participants with adequate retention were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients with inadequate retention (median patient satisfaction score 9.17 versus 8.47, respectively; p = 0.02).Adherence to HAARTA total of 94 were “taking or supposed to be taking HIV medicines.” Among those prescribed HAART, 46 , 28 , 16 , 6 , 2 and 2 reported “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” and “very poor” adherence, respectively. Participants who reported “excellent” adherence were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients who did not (median patient satisfaction score 10.00 versus 8.61, respectively; p,.0001).HIV suppressionHIV RNA values at the time of survey completion 630 days were available for 84 of participants (N = 409). Seventy percent of these patients achieved HIV suppression. Participants who achieved HIV suppression were significantly more satisfied with their HIV care than patients who did not (median patient satisfaction score 9.17 versus 8.47, respectively; p,.01).Baseline modelThe baseline model evaluated the roles of retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART as independent antecedents to HIV suppression (Figure 1). The hypothesized model was a justidentified 15481974 model with zero degrees of freedom. As such, the model did 11967625 not allow a test of goodness-of-fit, since technically, all goodness-of-fit indexes in the estimated model have maximum values (x2 = 0.00, df = 0, p = 0.00, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.00). However, the model still provides suitable estimates of the hypothesized relationships between latent variables. Table 3 shows the parameter estimates from the baseline model. Retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART were significantly associated with greater HIV suppression (standardized coefficient = .220, p,.0001 and standardized coefficient = .287, p,.0001, respectively).Figure 1. Baseline Model of Retention in HIV Care, Adherence to HAART and HIV Suppression (N = 489). Values indicate standardized coefficients; * p,0.05; ** p,0.001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054729.gdardized coefficient = 0.280, p,.0001, respectively) (Table 3). The direct effects of patient satisfaction on retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART were also significant (standardized coefficient = 0.181, ,.0001 and standardized coefficient = 0.203, p,.0001, respectively). The direct effect of patient satisfaction on HIV suppression was not significant (standardized coefficient = .032, p = .60).DiscussionIn this study of 489 participants receiving outpatient HIV primary care, overall patient satisfaction with care is positively related to retention in HIV care and adherence to HAART, which in turn serve as key determinants of HIV suppression. The data suggest that patient satisfaction may provide a way to improve HIV outcomes through its positive influences on adherence to HAART and retention in HIV care. This finding suggests that patient-centered interventions designed to improve the care experience coul.