1177/1754073913477505. ?Eder, A. B., Musseler, J., Hommel, B. (2012). The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychological Research, 76, 111?18. doi:ten. 1007/s00426-011-0327-6. Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., Hommel, B. (2015). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor approach. Psychological Investigation, 79, 630?49. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0590-4. Elsner, B., Hommel, B. (2001). Impact anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229?40. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1. 229. Fodor, E. M. (2010). Power motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3?9). Oxford: University Press. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., Magee, J. C. (2003). From energy to action. Journal of Personality and Social KN-93 (phosphate) chemical information Psychology, 85, 453. doi:ten.1037/0022-3514.85.three.453. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in functionality control: with special reference towards the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Overview, 77, 73?9. doi:ten.1037/h0028689. Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action handle: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig (Eds.), Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline (pp. 113?36). Cambridge: MIT Press. ?Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action organizing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849?78. doi:ten.1017/S0140525X01000103. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of skilled utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375?05. a0023781 doi:ten.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence involving implicit and explicit measures with the wants for achievement, affiliation, and energy. Frontiers in Psychology, five. doi:ten.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The impact of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious objectives on employee performance. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:10. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Influence and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically beneficial theory of aim setting and job motivation: a 35-year a0023781 doi:10.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic proof of low convergence in between implicit and explicit measures of your requirements for achievement, affiliation, and energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:ten.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The impact of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious ambitions on employee performance. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:ten. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:ten.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of objective setting and activity motivation: a 35-year 10508619.2011.638589 odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705?17. doi:ten.1037/0003-066X. 57.9.705. Marien, H., Aarts, H., Custers, R. (2015). The interactive role of action-outcome learning and good affective facts in motivating human goal-directed behavior. Motivation Science, 1, 165?83. doi:ten.1037/mot0000021. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, abilities, and values figure out what people today do. American Psychologist, 40, 812?25. doi:10. 1037/0003-066X.40.7.812. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.motivating people to picking the actions that improve their well-being.Acknowledgments We thank Leonie Eshuis and Tamara de Kloe for their assistance with Study two. Compliance with ethical requirements Ethical statement Each research received ethical approval in the Faculty Ethics Critique Committee of your Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences at Utrecht University. All participants provided written informed consent ahead of participation. Open Access This short article.