Or analyses were performed. Factors with Eigen values 51 were retained. After running each factor analysis, factor loadings were orthogonally rotated. Proportions indicating the relative weight of each factor in the total variance were noted. Correlational analyses were used to quantify the construct validity of certain measures. Pearson’s correlation coefficient scores and their P-values were calculated.Pilot testingPilot testing was performed to determine the practicality of conducting the telephone survey and to receive feedback regarding the survey format and content. An early version of the survey was used during pilot testing and was administered to volunteer lupus patients (three white and two African-American) from the Lupus Foundation. The original survey was then modified to the current version based upon preliminary results. Based upon feedback, we developed a response card containing L-660711 sodium saltMedChemExpress MK-571 (sodium salt) potential answers to the survey questions. Each subject was given this card upon consenting to participate.Statistical analysisRacial/ethnic differences in willingness to accept CYC or participate in a clinical trial involving new, experimental medications for SLE were analysed using w2 analysis. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to compare the demographic, psychosocial and clinical characteristics between subjects who did and did not agree to CYC administration or clinical trial participation.www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.orgErnest R. Vina et al.Categorical variables were compared by w2 analysis or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared by a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. To determine the most significant determinants of (i) willingness to receive CYC administration and (ii) willingness to participate in a clinical trial involving a novel, experimental medication, logistic order Ensartinib regression analyses were performed and their deviances from a saturated model were calculated. Willingness was defined as agreement with the aggressive medical management preference statement (i.e. selecting strongly agree or agree). Deviances were then compared using w2 analysis to determine the best model; significance was set at the 5 level. To be parsimonious, only variables shown to be related to preferences for either measure of aggressive medical management (P 4 0.05) were considered. Logistic regression models were also performed to evaluate the relationship between patient preferences and race/ethnicity, adjusted for patient characteristics. The initial model in these analyses included only race/ethnicity as the independent variable. Patient characteristics and beliefs that may mediate this relationship, based on bivariate analyses (P 4 0.05) and theoretical models, were then serially added to subsequent models to determine whether these covariates may explain the difference between the racial/ethnic groups’ treatment preferences. A linear association between each potential mediating variable with the log-odds of each dependent variable was also checked; continuous variables were converted into categorical variables with non-linear associations [21]. Finally, data were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models and results were similar to logistic regression models (data not shown). Logistic regression was preferred over ordinal logistic regression for simplicity, ease of interpretability and theoretical soundness. All analyses were performed using STATA 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).Table 2 shows p.Or analyses were performed. Factors with Eigen values 51 were retained. After running each factor analysis, factor loadings were orthogonally rotated. Proportions indicating the relative weight of each factor in the total variance were noted. Correlational analyses were used to quantify the construct validity of certain measures. Pearson’s correlation coefficient scores and their P-values were calculated.Pilot testingPilot testing was performed to determine the practicality of conducting the telephone survey and to receive feedback regarding the survey format and content. An early version of the survey was used during pilot testing and was administered to volunteer lupus patients (three white and two African-American) from the Lupus Foundation. The original survey was then modified to the current version based upon preliminary results. Based upon feedback, we developed a response card containing potential answers to the survey questions. Each subject was given this card upon consenting to participate.Statistical analysisRacial/ethnic differences in willingness to accept CYC or participate in a clinical trial involving new, experimental medications for SLE were analysed using w2 analysis. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to compare the demographic, psychosocial and clinical characteristics between subjects who did and did not agree to CYC administration or clinical trial participation.www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.orgErnest R. Vina et al.Categorical variables were compared by w2 analysis or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared by a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. To determine the most significant determinants of (i) willingness to receive CYC administration and (ii) willingness to participate in a clinical trial involving a novel, experimental medication, logistic regression analyses were performed and their deviances from a saturated model were calculated. Willingness was defined as agreement with the aggressive medical management preference statement (i.e. selecting strongly agree or agree). Deviances were then compared using w2 analysis to determine the best model; significance was set at the 5 level. To be parsimonious, only variables shown to be related to preferences for either measure of aggressive medical management (P 4 0.05) were considered. Logistic regression models were also performed to evaluate the relationship between patient preferences and race/ethnicity, adjusted for patient characteristics. The initial model in these analyses included only race/ethnicity as the independent variable. Patient characteristics and beliefs that may mediate this relationship, based on bivariate analyses (P 4 0.05) and theoretical models, were then serially added to subsequent models to determine whether these covariates may explain the difference between the racial/ethnic groups’ treatment preferences. A linear association between each potential mediating variable with the log-odds of each dependent variable was also checked; continuous variables were converted into categorical variables with non-linear associations [21]. Finally, data were analysed using ordinal logistic regression models and results were similar to logistic regression models (data not shown). Logistic regression was preferred over ordinal logistic regression for simplicity, ease of interpretability and theoretical soundness. All analyses were performed using STATA 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).Table 2 shows p.