Cted 16S copies averaged across the three dilutions. Predicted copies calculated as described in Methods. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051931.tcurves ranged from 0.5 to 2.2-fold and no single conformation provided the best estimates for the genomes tested. Aside from the conformation of the DNA target 1326631 gene, several variables between the three studies could account in part for the differences in magnitude of gene estimates observed between eukaryotic versus prokaryotic systems. Those include but are not limited to: 1) the conformation of the circular standard tested and 2) the preparation of the standards. In the Hou et al. study [7], the implication that the circular plasmid was supercoiled must be inferred from the text, as a gel image was not included. In any case, estimates were much higher than those using the linear standard. In the maize study [8], 3-fold inflation in gene estimates was observed for the supercoiled versus the linearized standard. Interestingly, both supercoiled and nicked circular plasmids were prepared, but only the supercoiled was investigated for its affect on estimates using genomic DNA [8]. In results presented here, the effect of both circular plasmid conformations were assayed using microbial genomic DNA. Another source of variation was the method of standard preparation and quantification. Hou et al. purified the plasmids and amplicons prior to quantification based on the optical absorbance at OD260 [7]. Lin et al. demonstrated that supercoiled and linearized DNA showed differences in quantification based on the optical absorbance, but took measurements prior to purification [8]. In the present study, the digested plasmid standards and amplicons were purified andquantified following digestion or amplification to rid of enzymes or other contaminants that could interfere with quantification readings or compete with components in the qPCR reaction. Our objective was to determine if a propagated plasmid DNA standard was purchase 166518-60-1 suitable for prokaryotic gene estimates where qPCR analyses are 38916-34-6 biological activity performed on a routine basis. Little standard preparation is required for using propagated plasmids aside from quantifying and diluting a frozen plasmid aliquot prior to qPCR setup. Minimal preparation of standards, in lieu of linearization or PCR amplification and purification saves time and reagents and gives the same quality data as the more time-consuming standard preparation methods. We therefore believe our results showing similar estimates of the 16S rRNA gene copy number support the use of circular plasmids for qPCR standards. Circular plasmid standards will facilitate the practical analysis of industrial and environmental samples in labs that perform many different qPCR assays targeting different microbial taxa.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: ALO KED. Performed the experiments: ALO. Analyzed the data: ALO. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: KED. Wrote the paper: ALO KED. Revised and approved final version of paper: ALO KED.
HIV/AIDS is one of the biggest health crises the world faces today, with close to two-thirds of all people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) residing in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The prevalence of 18325633 HIV/AIDS in Uganda in 2012 stood at 7.2 , with women disproportionately represented [2]. The recent ministry of health demographic survey put the prevalence of HIV/AIDS at 8.3 in women and 6.1 in men [2]. Treatment coverage for PLWHA is poor in Uganda, with only half of PLWHA a.Cted 16S copies averaged across the three dilutions. Predicted copies calculated as described in Methods. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051931.tcurves ranged from 0.5 to 2.2-fold and no single conformation provided the best estimates for the genomes tested. Aside from the conformation of the DNA target 1326631 gene, several variables between the three studies could account in part for the differences in magnitude of gene estimates observed between eukaryotic versus prokaryotic systems. Those include but are not limited to: 1) the conformation of the circular standard tested and 2) the preparation of the standards. In the Hou et al. study [7], the implication that the circular plasmid was supercoiled must be inferred from the text, as a gel image was not included. In any case, estimates were much higher than those using the linear standard. In the maize study [8], 3-fold inflation in gene estimates was observed for the supercoiled versus the linearized standard. Interestingly, both supercoiled and nicked circular plasmids were prepared, but only the supercoiled was investigated for its affect on estimates using genomic DNA [8]. In results presented here, the effect of both circular plasmid conformations were assayed using microbial genomic DNA. Another source of variation was the method of standard preparation and quantification. Hou et al. purified the plasmids and amplicons prior to quantification based on the optical absorbance at OD260 [7]. Lin et al. demonstrated that supercoiled and linearized DNA showed differences in quantification based on the optical absorbance, but took measurements prior to purification [8]. In the present study, the digested plasmid standards and amplicons were purified andquantified following digestion or amplification to rid of enzymes or other contaminants that could interfere with quantification readings or compete with components in the qPCR reaction. Our objective was to determine if a propagated plasmid DNA standard was suitable for prokaryotic gene estimates where qPCR analyses are performed on a routine basis. Little standard preparation is required for using propagated plasmids aside from quantifying and diluting a frozen plasmid aliquot prior to qPCR setup. Minimal preparation of standards, in lieu of linearization or PCR amplification and purification saves time and reagents and gives the same quality data as the more time-consuming standard preparation methods. We therefore believe our results showing similar estimates of the 16S rRNA gene copy number support the use of circular plasmids for qPCR standards. Circular plasmid standards will facilitate the practical analysis of industrial and environmental samples in labs that perform many different qPCR assays targeting different microbial taxa.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: ALO KED. Performed the experiments: ALO. Analyzed the data: ALO. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: KED. Wrote the paper: ALO KED. Revised and approved final version of paper: ALO KED.
HIV/AIDS is one of the biggest health crises the world faces today, with close to two-thirds of all people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) residing in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The prevalence of 18325633 HIV/AIDS in Uganda in 2012 stood at 7.2 , with women disproportionately represented [2]. The recent ministry of health demographic survey put the prevalence of HIV/AIDS at 8.3 in women and 6.1 in men [2]. Treatment coverage for PLWHA is poor in Uganda, with only half of PLWHA a.